Olympian challenge

11 April 2017

Dsc 8702

Work to construct the Parc Olympique started in 1967 and was finished in 1976, in time for the Montreal Olympics. The architect is Roger Taillibert and the 165 metre tower rises at a 45 degree angle. The main tenant of the newly refurbished tower will be local banking group Desjardins. It will occupy the tower with more than 1,000 employees. After the refurbishment is finished the arena part will also be done

A spectacular concrete building in Montreal, Canada, built for the 1976 Olympic Games, is undergoing a CDN$100 million refurbishment to prepare it for new occupants.

The enormous Olympic Tower is one of Canada’s most recognisable buildings and needs refurbishment inside and out to bring it back to its former glory. At 165 metres, it is the world’s tallest inclined tower and that, coupled with the sheer size of the building and the underground structure below it, presented challenges for its refurbishment.

Oregon, USA-headquartered international tower crane specialist Morrow was working for main contractor Pomerleau. Montreal-based Pomerleau works in all Canadian provinces. Pomerleau was trying to find a way, using mobile cranes, to reach all points on the tower, including the roof, to carry out the refurbishment work.

Mark forbes full size render

Mark Forbes, Morrow sales manager in Canada responsible for the company’s involvement in the Olympic Park project

Mark Forbes, Morrow Equipment sales manager in Canada, takes up the story, “These would have been very large mobile cranes and there is very limited access to the site and few suitable positions to set up such cranes. The biggest issue is the underground structure. When I first examined it, looking at the size of the mobiles, knowing the cost and limited availability of those cranes, I saw that it could be a worthwhile project for Morrow.”

Morrow’s local office in Montreal came up with a scheme for the high profile project that adressed concerns from the Olympic Park building’s owner, a government entity in Quebec, over safety and cost overruns.

Second phase solution

The first phase of the project was demolition, removing the skin of the tower, which was made from large precast concrete panels. “They weighed 16,000 pounds [7.3 tonnes] so, being a demolition project, we wanted close to 20,000 pounds [9 tonnes] of capacity to do that,” Forbes continues. Morrow’s solution involved using a pair of large tower cranes instead of competing proposals that wanted to use large wheeled mobile or crawler cranes.

To win the job, however, a solution was also essential for the second phase. The solution Morrow came up with was to use man baskets suspended from the cranes from where operators would refurbish the remaining surface of the tower’s structure. It would then have a whole new façade of glass, metal and LED lighting installed. “Legislation in Quebec at the time, however, did not allow the use of man baskets on tower cranes. That was the first problem” explains Forbes. “So behind the scenes I started work to get approval from CSST [the commission for standards, health and safety] in Quebec.

Dsc 8705

The 700 tonne-metre Liebherr 710 HC-L 32/64 Litronic luffer installed on the spine of the building’s tower. The project will add office space and include refurbishment of the observatory on top of the tower

“In the meantime, we were still pursuing the project with Pomerleau on pricing. When Pomerleau went to see CSST to see what their opinion was on hanging man baskets, they were surprised to find we had already initiated that effort and were well under way with it.

“Pomerleau picked up the points from there and came up with a detailed work plan with the assistance of Morrow and Morrow Engineering. At the end of the day that was acepted by CSST and was the basis of allowing them to move forward with tower cranes.

“The approval for this is ground-breaking and Pomerleau is still working with CSST internally to have province-wide acceptance of man baskets on tower cranes. At the moment it is site-specific. It is a first step towards new legislation for Quebec.”

Dsc 8684

“One of the biggest things with this project was seeing the cantilevered tower abover the tie-in and realising how robust the Liebherr tower system is,” says Morrow’s Mark Forbes 

Peter Juhren, Morrow vice president of operations, comments, “Using man baskets was the only available way to do this project, to access all points up and down and all sides of the tower. About 60 per cent of the work on the project involves using man baskets suspended from the cranes.”

Forbes says, “It was at least 30 % if not 50 % cheaper using tower cranes than using mobile cranes. Not only that, the timeline for installation and getting the project under way was much shorter with tower cranes.”

Crane choice

Morrow chose a 630 EC-H 20/40 Litronic saddle jib tower crane and a 700 tonne-metre 710 HC-L 32/64 Litronic luffer, both from Liebherr. The 630 was the principal crane. It lifts 40 tonnes and was configured with an 84 metre jib. The luffer can lift 64 tonnes and offers a maximum hoisting speed of 176 metres per minute.

Minimal modification was needed to use the cranes with man baskets. The 630 had a secondary brake added while the 710 already had one. In addition, Morrow modified the hook blocks a little bit. The hanging man basket has rigging so that it doesn’t fall if the hook separated from the block or if the rigging fails, the same as for mobile cranes.

Dsc 8672

The height of the Liebherr 630 EC-H 20/40 Litronic tower crane on the project is 630 feet (200 metres), making it the tallest tower crane in Canada, according to owner Morrow Equipment

The second biggest point, in particular with the 630, was its ability to have a hook height of 630 feet (200 metres) which is above the top of the tower, with one tie-in, Forbes explains. “First of all we determined that it was possible to do. The tie-in is 65 feet [20 metres] long. With Morrow Engineering we came up with an erection process where we could freestand the tower, make the tie-in connection to the building – which was a challenge – and then erect the crane on top of the tower after that with the tie-in connected,” Forbes says.

The tie-in comprises three extended custom struts to secure the 630 EC-H to the building. Lots of thought went into them, Forbes says. They have walkways, as that is the only way to do the daily inspections. They have fall arrest lanyard attachment points. And there are step-downs so that the erectors can get in to make the connections.

Forbes continues, “We erected the 630’s tower enough to get the climber on, put the tie-in collar and struts on, then the climber, then we erected the crane.” A 600 tonne capacity Demag CC 2800-1 lattice boom crawler crane with luffing jib from Grues JM Francoeur was used. The whole area had to be matted and there was 6,000 tons of fill to level the surface, compacted to 98 %, drainage added and then the mats on top. Extensive truss work was installed in the basement of the building to support the tower crane.

The 710 tower crane was erected using a 500 tonne capacity Liebherr LTM 1500 telescopic wheeled mobile crane with luffing jib, also from Grues JM Francoeur. The 710 sits on a portal base straddling a track for a funicular railway that runs up the spine of the tower to an observatory on top. Along with the rest of the building, the railway remains in operation. Forbes says penetrating the stressed concrete to anchor the base to the building was hard work. Both tower cranes are working at the same time. The 630 is working a double shift and it will be up well into 2018, coming down later in the first quarter. The 710 will come down at the end of 2017. Both cranes operate through 360 degrees and both have Hook Cam cameras with remote viewing stations in the safety director’s office.

Latest News
Access Alliance welcomes Plantool
Plantool joins UK and Ireland rental alliance at Belfast meeting 
Partnerlift takes on SIM-Tec
Rental, sales and service company expands cooperative’s presence in Rhineland
Venpa acquires LocaTop
Investment continues group’s fast expansion in Italy