Sergey Efremov – The birth of a market

20 April 2016

Razmax's demolition projects in Russia include Varskavskiy railway station in St Petersburg

Razmax's demolition projects in Russia include Varskavskiy railway station in St Petersburg

What does “the market” mean?

If you define it as a simple mechanism that puts buyers and sellers together, then a fully formed demolition market really does exist in Russia.

There is a need to perform demolition and there are companies who do so.

But if you start with the market as a complex system where unified price politics and general rules exist, and all the main players interact with each other, it is difficult to say that there is such a thing as a Russian demolition market.

It is still in the process of being formed.

Back in the USSR

Before the break-up of the old Soviet Union, there were no specialist demolition companies as such. There were trusts, which worked under the control of the state and carried out the state’s orders. Within these trusts, management mechanisms existed to run the entire cycle of work.

The highest peak of demolition development in Russia under the centralised economics of the Soviet state was during and just after the Second World War, between 1942 and 1950. An enormous number of buildings that had been destroyed needed to be fully restored, which involved them being fully or partly disassembled.

At that time technology was quite primitive, with the “standard package” including a cart and workforce. Beyond this, there was the 4111B, a pneumatic excavator bought on lend-lease from the USA, working with a diesel engine and pneumatic compressor.

Though not supposed to be used for demolition, its bucket was eventually replaced by a wrecking ball.

Fresh start

At the end of the 20th century, and the beginning of the 21st, two parallel processes started in Russia.

Firstly, management was privatised, with some players – who were not used to the competitive atmosphere – almost leaving the market. Secondly, private companies started to be set up – Razmax was an example of this, in 1997.

We understood that it was not possible to achieve the number of projects we needed without more modern equipment.

With this machinery only available outside the country, it was up to us to bring the first excavators, destroyers, crushing plants and hydraulic scissors from Europe.

But the demand for all innovative technologies was not the same, due to Russia’s use of different materials, particularly in metal and concrete. A lot of technologies now widely spread across Europe have still not been accepted in Russia.

It’s not just the machine

From the late 1990s onwards, other companies actively started buying machinery. This ‘arms race’ ran for the next 10 years. Believing that successful project implementation depended on the amount of machinery in the fleet, demolition companies borrowed money to buy the newest models, resulting in the busiest period yet for leasing machinery.

Looking back, this stage was important for the development of the Russian demolition industry because quality machinery is the biggest part of success. Technique without technology or technique without specialisation is nothing.

Now, the Russian market is at a crossroads – a stage where it has the technical facilities to go ahead, but no unified, civilised market. For instance, there are a number of companies looking to recycle construction and demolition waste, but no regulatory body.

The current situation

No one is saying that Russian demolition is a complete mess. There is a mechanism for getting projects approved and getting permission for building. There are SNiPs and GOSTs – standards and certification services – that our experts develop alongside the state authorities.

But there is still no clear unified regulator that can judge the quality and value for money of demolition works. This means there are many companies, especially in remote regions, offering clients cheap prices to save on the cost of people and materials.

Apart from the lack of unified legislation, there is no education programme for demolition and the only way people can learn is by experience, and the experience of others.

In the current situation, the best solution is to develop one’s own training programmes and give this experience to the new demolition specialists. This is the way Razmax works.

But at the moment most people ‘crush and run’. They don’t care about technologies.

Demolition in Russia has overcome its crisis. Production is being modernised, new buildings are under construction.

But it is impossible to put up new buildings without preparing the site.

Many of the factories inherited from the old USSR are at the end of their useful life and dangerous, and should be demolished by professionals – the generation of professional demolition companies that are just coming into being now.

And with large demolition projects in Russia are increasing at a rate of 35% a year, we are sure this market has a future.

This is taken from the March-April 2016 issue of Demolition & Recycling International. To see the full article, including additional images, or to receive the magazine on a regular basis, please visit

Latest News
Aggreko report shows engineers willing to pay more for ‘green’ equipment
Willingness to pay more is driven by need to fulfil company sustainability strategies
Haulotte announces Thailand distributor
New partnership to aid OEM’s growth in the region 
UK competition watchdog to investigate 8 major UK housebuilders
The UK’s competition watchdog is to investigate eight of the country’s biggest housebuilders following evidence that suggests they may have been sharing commercially sensitive information.