How has Covid-19 affected demolition projects?

09 July 2020

Every time I pen some thoughts for a column, there is always the chance that the external landscape may have changed by the time my views appear in print. In the past few years, I have sometimes been asked to speak about Brexit, for example, and consequently tried to cover multiple scenarios to ensure the commentary remains relevant.

The Coronavirus battle and the demolition landscape
Fast forward to the situation we currently find ourselves in – the global battle against Coronavirus – and the landscape has never been so fluid.

Richard Vann web

Richard Vann, managing director, RVA Group

Everyone is perhaps tired of hearing the fact that we are experiencing “unprecedented times”, but of course that admittedly overused phrase is incredibly true.

That said, when planning, savvy organisations try to anticipate various eventualities – from best to worst case. So, while we are perhaps facing extremities of planning that some demolition firms will unsurprisingly not have encountered before, we must stick to the same underlying principles we are used to.

Environment, health and safety – a non-negotiable baseline
I have always said that no two projects are ever the same in the world of demolition, and Covid-19 has not changed that. In addition to all existing EHS (environment, health and safety) protocols, adherence to safe distancing regulations must be the non-negotiable baseline, of course, and continued monitoring of evolving guidance is paramount. But there are then multiple other project-specific factors to accommodate too – they have not been eradicated because of the virus.

Speaking from personal experience over the past few weeks, we have seen some projects adapt rapidly to a “new normal” and approximately 70% of our sites have remained open as a result. Elsewhere, other works have stopped entirely, for the foreseeable future. There has not been a singular method of coping with the pressures being faced.

We are currently supporting a UK pharmaceutical client with a project in a live and operational environment, for instance, and the schedule here remains almost uninterrupted. In the first few weeks of lockdown, we continued to develop our decommissioning specifications and plans remotely, rather than on site.

And, when it was essential to physically inspect the plant, for example, the client arranged a system to visit the workface on our behalf and feed information back.

Keeping a core production team on site
This client is considered an essential business so has kept a core production team on site, meaning visits to site could be organised relatively swiftly.

We have maintained regular contact via video calls throughout, when not in the same physical location, so that we can continue to consult with one another, and this media-rich form of communication has worked well. At the time of writing, we hope to have a full team back on site soon, with social distancing measures naturally in place.

Other sites closed for approximately a couple of weeks when the United Kingdom prime minister Boris Johnson first announced the lockdown. In these instances – typically projects at the physical decontamination, dismantling or demolition phase – such “pauses” provided an important opportunity to take stock and devise plans with contractors and clients. These included introducing upgraded security measures and temporary make-safe operations.

With the duration of the suspension period being unknown, a range of flexible care and maintenance regimes also had to be considered.

Preventing skills gaps on demolition sites
Again, every scenario has been different. However, generally the priority has been to reduce the number of people on site to the absolute minimum, while being careful to prevent any skills gaps arising. On this note, it is important to stress that the usual project safety considerations must remain paramount – Covid-19 or no Covid-19.

A proficiently skilled team is always required to carry out the work, so now is not the time to cut corners. If the work cannot be carried out safely with a condensed team, it cannot go ahead.

There are projects elsewhere that stopped completely, either for reasons such as this or because the client was more comfortable allowing schedules to be reframed. The current commodity value of scrap metal has come into play too, as well as logistical difficulties associated with moving materials.

Differing regulations on international projects
We are now seeing positive movement on most of these sites though. The biggest changes have centred upon access and accommodation arrangements for staff, so that we have utmost confidence that people can shower, eat and use toilets without compromising social distancing guidance.

Given our international presence, we have had to remain abreast with slightly differing regulations from one country to the next. But this is the way we always work – whether we are in the thick of a health crisis or not.

We must be respectful of every client situation, cultural variations and so on. But whatever the local rules and customs may be, we will never put people at risk.

Latest News
CSCEC-built spiral tunnel officially recognised as world’s longest
A spiral tunnel in China, built by Chinese construction giant China State Construction (CSCEC), has been recognised as the world’s longest
Consortium wins €302m deal to build Swiss railway plant
A consortium led by Swiss construction company CSC Costruzioni has won a contract worth €302 million (US$327 million) to build a new railway plant in Switzerland
Epiroc to acquire French attachments manufacturer
Swedish OEM continues massive attachments expansion following Stanley acquisition